SECURITY & PRIVACY

Correspondence deserves thoughtful protection.

Personal letters and business documents can reveal information that should not be available to strangers, search engines or unauthorised colleagues. Epistles is being designed around protected storage, controlled access and a clear separation between public marketing content and private correspondence records.

Client workspace available · Postal services quoted separately
EPISTLES / SECURITY & PRIVACY
E.
Documented. Organised. Understood.✳
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE

The correspondence workflow in practice.

For an individual, the expectation is straightforward: nobody else should see private letters by guessing a URL. For a business, access must also account for the relevant organisation, department, user role and matter. PDF previews, search results and evidence exports all require the same care as the original document.

Public QR verification is a particular example of balancing usefulness and confidentiality. The verification page should disclose only approved minimum information, never the full underlying letter by default. Security claims on the website will reflect controls that have been implemented and independently verified.

A particularly important threat is insecure direct access to document identifiers. A public reference or predictable URL must never allow one customer to download another person’s correspondence. Every document view, thumbnail, search result and export needs server-side permission checks against the appropriate tenant and user. Signed temporary links can be useful, but they need short lifetimes, suitable scopes and a way to revoke access where required.

Security also includes the work that happens off-screen. Staff handling print-and-post jobs need controlled access to production documents, and operational logs must not unnecessarily copy private letter content. Background queues, payment integrations and outbound email each introduce separate risks that should be assessed before launch. A minimal public website with no account login should not be misrepresented as evidence that the future full platform has already passed security certification.

01 / 02

An example: access when responsibility changes

A team member may leave a department while their correspondence remains relevant to an ongoing matter. The organisation needs to decide who becomes responsible and which access should change. Retaining the documents does not mean retaining unnecessary access for the former role, and handing over a task does not require sharing every unrelated record.

Use the security discussion to describe your information boundaries: separate clients, restricted matters, authorised reviewers and any operational staff handling printed documents. Ask how those boundaries will apply to search, previews, downloads and exports as well as the main workspace. Security claims should be assessed against the actual application and operating arrangements. The public website does not currently accept private letter uploads or establish certification of the future correspondence platform.

02 / 02

Privacy is part of the service, not an afterthought

Correspondence often contains sensitive personal, financial or business information. Access control, secure transport, protected storage and careful document sharing have to be designed into the workflow from the beginning. Individuals should see only their own records, while organisations should be able to grant carefully scoped access to colleagues.

Public QR verification, analytics and search indexing must not become shortcuts around those restrictions. Retention should reflect legitimate requirements rather than promising to keep everything forever. Customers need clear explanations of how records are stored, who can handle postal fulfilment and what happens when they request deletion or export.

GOOD TO KNOW

Questions worth asking.

Clear answers about the workflow and its limits. The service described is being developed; availability is confirmed only when a feature is launched and tested.

Are letter files visible to the public?

Private records are intended to remain behind authenticated, permission-checked storage and download routes.

Does a QR reveal the letter contents?

The proposed public verification response is limited to safe approved metadata.

What does SHA-256 do?

It supports integrity checking of exact file bytes; other controls are required for identity and delivery assurance.

How will security be tested?

Access, tenancy isolation, privacy, configuration and operational workflows must be tested before launch.

Is the platform already certified to a particular standard?

No certification should be claimed until independently verified and formally obtained.

Public resources are available now.

The client workspace, document records and QR verification are available at my.epistles.uk. Postal requests start with a quotation. Contact Epistles to discuss your requirements.

CONTACT EPISTLES

Bring us the correspondence task you want to improve.

Tell us what you need, who is involved and the outcome you want to achieve. We will discuss the right next step.