An example: access when responsibility changes
A team member may leave a department while their correspondence remains relevant to an ongoing matter. The organisation needs to decide who becomes responsible and which access should change. Retaining the documents does not mean retaining unnecessary access for the former role, and handing over a task does not require sharing every unrelated record.
Use the security discussion to describe your information boundaries: separate clients, restricted matters, authorised reviewers and any operational staff handling printed documents. Ask how those boundaries will apply to search, previews, downloads and exports as well as the main workspace. Security claims should be assessed against the actual application and operating arrangements. The public website does not currently accept private letter uploads or establish certification of the future correspondence platform.
Privacy is part of the service, not an afterthought
Correspondence often contains sensitive personal, financial or business information. Access control, secure transport, protected storage and careful document sharing have to be designed into the workflow from the beginning. Individuals should see only their own records, while organisations should be able to grant carefully scoped access to colleagues.
Public QR verification, analytics and search indexing must not become shortcuts around those restrictions. Retention should reflect legitimate requirements rather than promising to keep everything forever. Customers need clear explanations of how records are stored, who can handle postal fulfilment and what happens when they request deletion or export.